<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instance Initializers in Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://code.deepinspace.net/2010/05/22/instance-initializers-in-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://code.deepinspace.net/2010/05/22/instance-initializers-in-java/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=instance-initializers-in-java</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anumod</title>
		<link>http://code.deepinspace.net/2010/05/22/instance-initializers-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>anumod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.deepinspace.net/?p=101#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>nice one :)

so question: for snippet 3 why bother with the initializer block when you can just put the code in directly and have an anonymous class created with that as the def constructor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one <img src='http://code.deepinspace.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>so question: for snippet 3 why bother with the initializer block when you can just put the code in directly and have an anonymous class created with that as the def constructor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

